The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias

Can conservatives and liberals find common ground to combat religious persecution around the globe? That was the assumption of the sponsors of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 that Congress passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. But 20 years later, as the Trump administration is prioritizing this concern, it’s clear that not even this seemingly nonpartisan cause is neutral ground in the culture wars that continue to divide Americans.

The act called for the creation of an ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom and the creation of a bipartisan commission to provide independent policy recommendations. While the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations appointed ambassadors and issued, as the act demanded, an annual report on religious persecution, the State Department has now augmented this effort by convening its first conference on the subject last week. The persecution has worsened in the past two decades, with little but lip service offered as a solution, so the timing of the conference was right. Moreover, even in an administration that is as polarizing as this one, this effort ought to have generated the same kind of bipartisan support as the original legislation.

But as a Sunday New York Times editorial demonstrated, the fight for religious liberty abroad is now as much a source of partisan division as the religious-freedom cause taken up by conservative Christians in America.

It’s not surprising that the Times would find something to criticize in just about anything the Trump administration does. But the views in the paper’s editorial, “A Too-Narrow Vision of Religious Freedom,” are indistinguishable from anti-Christian prejudice. As far as the Times was concerned, Evangelical Christians’ interest in religious liberty and the Trump administration’s effort on their behalf renders the subject questionable if not altogether suspect.

The U.S. ambassador for international religious freedom, Sam Brownback, pledged to protect freedoms for “all faiths,” but the editorial said that he made this vow “despite his own strict Catholic leanings” — as if American Catholics supported the imposition of a new edition of the Spanish Inquisition.

Comments

Privacy Policy

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias is dedicated to protecting consumer privacy on the Internet. Our practices are consistent with privacy guidelines established by eTrust.com.

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias does not require any personal information to obtain access to our website.

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias does require limited personal information including name and mailing address from individuals wishing to join as members. Additional information such as e-mail address and phone number may also be requested in order that we may contact members in a timely manner on issues related to our mission.

You will only receive e-mail from us if you request to be added to our e-mail list. You may revise or remove your e-mail address from our files at any time.

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias uses "cookie" technology to obtain non-personal information from our online visitors, such as browser/computer type, number of visitors, and site usage. We do not use cookies to extract personal information.

Our website contains links to other sites, but The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias does not necessarily advocate, support or condone the privacy practices or content of these websites.

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias makes all information received from our online visitors as secure as possible against unauthorized access and use. All information is protected by state-of-the-art security technology.

The Resistance Shows Its Anti-Christian Bias respects the individual privacy rights and concerns of visitors to our website. We support meaningful self-regulation of the Internet to ensure that responsible organizations maintain the right to use all communications media to interact with the public.